I was going to write
about my opinions about flow trails, but every time I worked through my
arguments, I managed to convince myself that they were incorrect, so I'm
bailing on that. My thoughts, after thinking it over for the better part of a
week and a half, are maybe when you build a new flow trail, you should have to
let it sit for two to three years and not perform any maintenance on it (unless
there's some severe weather event such as flooding or large blow-downs). That
way, the trail corridor you created will merge itself into the surrounding
landscape so it doesn't look so out of place. After that, the goal of your
maintenance should be to maintain that merged status, not to return it to it's
just-built form. This addresses my main problem with new-school flow trials:
they just look out of place in most areas (see the cover photo of Access Action
in Dirt Rag issue #182). My second issue with
flow trails is just as easily addressed. Other than a few trails on Narrowback
Mountain outside Stokesville, VA, most new-school trails I've seen/ridden
completely bypass (or remove) any natural features (i.e. scree slopes, or a
rocky ledge). I believe that trails should reflect the geology of they area
they are built in. If you're in Michaux, why would you build a trail without
big rock features? Michaux has big rocks. The counter-argument (i.e. the
pro-flow trail argument) here is that new-school flow trails are easier for
beginners and help get them into the sport. This is great, and necessary, but
there has to be some progression. If you have an area large enough to have 20
trails in it, how many of them should be easy, flow trails, how many
intermediate trails, and how many advanced trails? This is a hard question to
answer and means that we can't just have one approach to building trails.
Certain areas have to be only beginner trails, or only advanced trails.
Basically, my point is make the trails you build match the geology/terrain of
the area you're building them in. Most people who want to get into mountain
biking want to get into it because they like the idea of riding a bike on the
trails nearest them, regardless of how difficult those trails are. In Fair Hill
NMRA (in MD), they're like "The idea of riding a bicycle on these tight,
tight twisty trails sounds rad!" while at White Ranch OS (in CO) they're
like "The idea of riding a bicycle on these rocky, steep,
switchback-filled trails sounds rad!" Both of those things are awesome and
should be supported by building trails that are appropriate to the area they
are being built in.
Anyway... I digress...
Last week I drove to
Dallas and back, which kind of sucked. I was pretty impressed with northern New
Mexico (many cool volcanoes) and the Texas Panhandle (cool, rolling desert-ey
terrain), but the Dallas-Ft. Worth Metro Area reminded me of the worst parts of
the Baltimore Metro Area (i.e. the part that we lived in). Don't get me wrong,
Havre de Grace is a cool little town and we were lucky that it was more or less
the end of Baltimore's suburban sprawl, but areas like Abingdon and White Marsh
are just endless shopping malls. It's definitely not my favorite place, and
neither was the suburb of Dallas I was in. I did, however, have some good
barbecue, so there's that.
Beautiful volcanoes in northern New Mexico. |
Texas-shaped waffles in Texas. |
Water + below freezing temperatures + centripetal force = SCIENCE. |
The big news in the bike
world this week is that I went full in and bought a SRAM XX1 group and Shimano XTR pedals for my Pivot Mach 429c. I am very excited about this.
While 1x10 gearing might work for a lot of people in a lot of places, here in
Colorado, having the wider range offered by the 1x11 set up is almost
necessary, especially for doing long races. I'm also stoked to not have to
rebuild Crank Brother's pedals every year (or twice a year). It might take me a
few rides to get used to the pedals, but the increased reliability will be
worth it. Plus, since I was using Crank Brother's Candy pedals before, I'm not
taking that much of a weight penalty. I think if I decide to dive back into
cyclocross again I'd still use Eggbeaters on that bike; Eggbeaters are far and
away the best CX pedal.
Pretty bike, ready for rassin! |
Pretty XX1, ready for maintaining reasonable cadences on steep climbs. |
So that's cool. Thanks
to SRAM for
hooking us up at 92Fifty with these sweet parts! I'm most
excited because the first race of the year is next weekend. I'll be putting all
the training I've done to the test by throwing down in the hundred at the True
Grit Epic. Hopefully you'll hear from me again after that!
It's still winter, so
stay warm everyone!
No comments:
Post a Comment